Labrador
Contracts
Socials
Labrador Your Loyal Crypto Companion! 🦮
Score
80%
Low Risk
Rank#-
Percentile
Top20%
Vitals
35%Market
35%Decentralization
47%Fundamentals
92%Security
95%Vote for Labrador!
Audit • KYC • PenTestNo Discount Yet
1
votesSecurity
Score
95%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Top10%
0%50%100%
Score History
High95
▲0.30
Low94
▶
Audited By Cyberscope
9All Findings
9Unresolved
0Acknowledged
0Resolved
0 Critical
0 Medium
9 Minor
9 Unresolved
SeverityCodeTitleStatusRSMLRedundant SafeMath LibraryunresolvedMEMMissing Error MessagesunresolvedIDIImmutable Declaration ImprovementunresolvedL04Conformance to Solidity Naming ConventionsunresolvedL07Missing Events ArithmeticunresolvedL09Dead Code EliminationunresolvedL15Local Scope Variable ShadowingunresolvedL16Validate Variable SettersunresolvedL17Usage of Solidity Assemblyunresolved
Source
Address
NetworkBSC
Audited Files/SHA256
BABYTOKEN.sol
Trade Analysis
Breakdown
Can Set Fees
Safe
Can Mint
Safe
Can Burn
Safe
Can Blacklist
Safe
Can Transfers User's Tokens
Safe
Can Stop Transfers
Safe
Can Whitelist
Safe
Can Change Max Tx AmountNo
Information
ProxyNO
Renounced
Ownership is renounced
Code VisibleYES
Total Supply10T
Circulating Supply9.8T (98%)
Burned Amount200B (2%)
Decimals18
Features
Rebase–
Buyback–
Dividend Distributor
Autogen Liquidity
Reflections–
Fundamentals
Score
92%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Top10%
0%50%100%
Score History
High92
0
Low92
▶
Timeline
KYC
Cyberscope KYCKYC Passed
Open CertificationYou'll be redirected to Github to view it
Market
Vitals
Score
35%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Bottom30%
0%50%100%
Score History
High35
0
Low35
▶
Website
DNS
9 Passed
1 Attention
Missing SPF record
Missing DMARC record
Missing DKIM record
Ineffective SPF record
SPF record contains a softfail without DMARC
Name Servers Versions exposed
Allow Recursive Queries
CNAME in NS Records
MX Records IPs are private
MX Records has Invalid Chars
Security
6 Passed
1 Attention
Avoids deprecated APIs
Inspector issues
Paste preventing inputs
Geolocation on start
Notification on start
Errors in console
Uses HTTPS
Vitals
7 Passed
1 Attention
Cumulative Layout Shift
Total Blocking Time
Speed Index
Viewport
First Contentful Paint
Largest Contentful Paint
robots.txt is valid
Links are crawlable
Penetration Testing
Is your website or app vulnerable to cyber attacks? Talk to us and find out!
Request Penetration Test
Listed
Coinscope
GeckoTerminalIf you have a project and want to learn more about our services, get in touch!
Contact UsDecentralisation
Score
47%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Bottom40%
0%50%100%
Score History
High47
0
Low46
▶
Burned Amount
Total Tokens Burned
7.5%of Total Supply
Tokens
Tokens
1.1T(11.3% supply)Tokens Burned
199.9B(1.9% supply)17.7% of Token Supply
Liquidity
Tokens
8.8T(88.7% supply)Tokens Burned
541.1B(5.4% supply)6% of Token Supply
Circulating Supply
Burned 741.1B(7.5% supply)
Circ. Supply 9.2T(92.5% supply)
Lockers
Total Tokens Locked
94.3%of Circ. Supply
Tokens
Tokens
1.1T(11.3% supply)Tokens Locked
400B(4% supply)35.5% of Token Supply
Liquidity
Tokens
8.8T(88.7% supply)Tokens Locked
8.3T(83.3% supply)93.8% of Token Supply
94.3% of Circulating Supply Locked
90.00%·in 5 months4.30%·in 4 months
90.00%·in 5 months4.30%·in 4 monthsTotal Lockers2
Token Lockers1
LP Lockers1
Providers
Token Holders
Token Holders498
Top 10 Wallets2%
Team Percentage0%
Distribution
| Holder | Share |
|---|---|
89%8.9T$8.6K | |
4%400B$386 | |
2%200B$193 | |
0%46B$44 | |
0%45B$44 | |
0%41B$40 | |
0%29B$28 | |
0%21B$20 | |
0%18B$18 | |
0%17B$16 | |
0%12B$12 | |
0%12B$11 | |
0%11B$11 | |
0%9.9B$9.6 | |
0%8.5B$8.2 | |
0%7.9B$7.6 | |
0%6.8B$6.5 | |
0%6.5B$6.3 | |
0%6.4B$6.2 | |
0%5.9B$5.7 | |
0%29M$0.028 | |
0%0.0000$0 | |
0%0.0000$0 | |
0%0.0000$0 | |
0%0.0000$0 |
